Hamish Stewart vs Matthew Summers Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Jul at 12:49 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Stewart vs M. Summers

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Stewart 1 - 0 Summers
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hamish Stewart winning 2 and Matthew Summers winning 0. The last match between Hamish Stewart and Matthew Summers was at the Nottingham 3 Challenger, 08-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Hamish Stewart getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stewart | 1 |
| Summers | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Nottingham 3 Challenger(07-08-25)
H. Stewart vs M. Summers H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 65.97% (157-81) | Career Total W/L | 59.20% (103-71) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
H. Stewart vs M. Summers Match Preview:
- Stewart's second serve performance recently stands at 46.76%, outperforming Summers' 43.27%. Does Stewart’s slightly superior second serve give them an edge? Yes, it suggests a stronger baseline game.
- Stewart has a stronger return game on second serves, claiming 45.41% of points, compared to Summers' 41.52%.
- Summers leads in first serve return points with 27.86%, surpassing Stewart's 22.15%. Could this strength help Summers to dominate rallies? It's certainly a potential advantage.
- Under pressure, Stewart has saved 56.93% of breakpoints recently, exceeding Summers' 51.24%. A good indicator of psychological toughness.
- Over the past year, Stewart has a win rate of 63.64%, slightly higher than Summers, who has a 57.81% win rate.
- Stewart's best surface is indoor hard courts with a 68% win rate, whereas Summers excels on grass, winning 67% of such matches.
- Despite a higher win rate at the same tournament level, Stewart’s opponents had a lower average rank of 396.39 compared to Summers' 333.45, indicating Summers has competed against stronger opponents overall.
- Both players have a 50% success rate in deciding sets over the past 12 months, indicating no clear advantage if the match becomes tightly contested.
- In breakpoint conversion, Summers is slightly more proficient at 35.79%, compared to Stewart's 33.7%.
Editorial Prediction (July 7, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance and strengths reveals a largely competitive match-up between Stewart and Summers. Stewart shows dependable second serve and return game strengths, which are pivotal in influencing match dynamics.
Summers demonstrates stronger first serve returns and has faced more highly ranked opponents, suggesting a potential to tackle high-intensity games effectively. Their better breakpoint conversion rate is another slight edge in crucial moments.
Ultimately, despite Stewart's slight edge in win and second serve stats, Summers' experience against tougher opponents and proficiency on grass gives her a narrow advantage. However, considering all factors, Summers is likely to emerge as the winner in this upcoming match.
Hamish Stewart vs Matthew Summers Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Stewart vs M. Summers H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:33:0 | Average Match Time | 1:33:0 |
| 63% (40/63) | 1st Serve % | 73% (58/79) |
| 85% (34/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (34/58) |
| 61% (14/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 71% (15/21) |
| 14% (1/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (30/79) | Return Points Win % | 24% (15/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
H. Stewart Recent Matches Played
M. Summers Recent Matches Played

H. Stewart vs M. Summers Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.97% (157/81) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.20% (103/71) |
| 63.67% (340/194) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.28% (230/158) |
| 55.24% (2856/2314) | Games Win/Loss | 53.32% (2017/1766) |
| 63.21% (67/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.69% (95/59) |
| 61.54% (8/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 70.64% (77/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 50.00% (5/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 0.63 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1602 | Aces Total | 266 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 768 | Total Double Faults | 273 |
| 1:26:32 | Average Match Time | 1:13:24 |
| 397.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 302.17 |
| 62% (8545/13681) | 1st Serve % | 67% (5393/8070) |
| 75% (6379/8545) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (3582/5393) |
| 50% (2568/5136) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1355/2677) |
| 40% (587/1478) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (378/821) |
| 39% (5784/14658) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3364/8126) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.56% (20/16) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 67.84% (135/64) | Futures W/L | 59.54% (103/70) |
| 66% (155/235) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (102/172) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 52% (46/88) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (30/55) |
| 51% (29/57) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (16/40) |
| 93% (152/141) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (107/93) |
| 7% (152/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (107/14) |
| 17% (86/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (67/10) |